deinedomain.tld

[Ria Tameg]

Now, because the Bible informs us that G-d already created a day at the moment He said, “let there be light”, then what was meant by the statement; “the evening and the morning were the first day;”? First day of what?

This is where only our Father, Yhvh, through one statement, is able to declare more truth and a deeper meaning, than ever taught by man’s teachings. How then, do we reconcile the above statement?

I went to the Strong’s Concordance and looked up the word ”were”; it is a Hebrew word #H1961 pronounced ”haya”. The next thing I wanted to investigate was if the word ”haya” had been used elsewhere in the Bible and could have had an alternative interpretation? I found in the Book of Kings where it states:

Then were the people of Israel divided into two parts: half of the people followed Tibni the son of Ginath, to make him king; and half followed Omri. 1 King 16:21

In reading this verse you, like me, are probably wondering what word or words were translated from ” the same Hebrew word “haya”?

In this verse, #H1961 ”haya” is translated “followed”. Could that mean that “haya” could have been translated ”followed” by the translators of the Bible and would that not have changed the meaning of the fifth verse in Genesis ch.1 of the Bible?

Would that change what day of the week certain things were created by G-d?

I stated earlier, only Yhvh, our Father in Heaven, can make a statement that could convey both revelation and truth to His scripture. Could ”haya” be translated both “were” and “followed”, and not distort Yhvh’s meaning of His truth or timeline?

Could it be that our Father in heaven was trying to tell how He intended His time was to be kept?

When one reads the fifth verse of Genesis 1; the evening and the morning “were” or “followed” the first day, how could they both be true?

What if “were” was meant for the first day of the week, and the translation, “followed”, was meant for the first day of the month? Both translations and statements would be true at the same time, and one would then be discerning the Word, as it reads. To repeat, if you read every verse in Genesis 1 that states

‘And the evening and the morning were…’,

you could deduce the word “were” for the day of the week and “followed” for the day of the month. Therefore, the day of the week could be 3, and the day of the month could be 4, within the same scripture reading.

For example:

And the evening and the morning were [followed] the third day. Gen.1:13

(explanation/alternate interpretation added)

Yhvh in His creation created three kinds of days, as verified throughout scripture; New Moon days, His Feast (mo~ed) days, and work days. New Moon days were set apart from all other days, six work days and the seventh day Sabbath, made up the week which happens four times throughout the month. Although, it is not so obvious, it is however asserted and verified in Genesis 2:1-4

Thus the heavens and the earth were finished, and all the host of them. And on the seventh day G-d ended his work which he had made; and he rested on the seventh day from all his work which he had made. And G-d blessed the seventh day, and sanctified it: because that in it he had rested from all his work which G-d created and made. These are the generations of the heavens and of the earth when they were created, in the day that the Lord G-d made the earth and the heavens, Gen.2:1-4

The LXX reads this verse

And the heavens and the earth were finished, and the whole world of them. And G-d finished on the sixth day His works which He made, and He ceased on the seventh day from all His works which He has made. And G-d blessed the seventh day and sanctified it, because in it He ceased from all His works which G-d began to do. This the book of the generation of heaven and earth, when they were made, in the day in which the Lord G-d made the heaven and the earth Gen.2:1-4 LXX

As stated in Genesis 2:2 in the King James version of the Bible according to the Hebrew lexicon they speak of two seventh days.

You might think that statement is really taking liberty and is an over reach of that particular scripture. But read it again, it stated in V2

And on the seventh day G-d ended His work which He had done. Gen.2.2

One has to ask, did G-d end His work on day seven of the week or did G-d end His work on the sixth day of the week?

As the Septuagint affirms, it is both days. (I took the liberty of bringing into our study the Septuagint. The Septuagint is the Greek translation of the Hebrew Bible. History chronicles that 70-72 Jewish scholars reportedly took part in the translation process. The scholars worked in Alexandria during the reign of Ptolemy II Philadelphus (285-247 BCE), according to the letter of Aristeas to his brother Philoerates. This early collection of scrolls, written in Greek, were around when Jesus was born, and began entering the temple to sit for His readings. This is the text Jesus would have encountered, and this is what He could have read when He stood to read the scrolls.) The Septuagint makes obvious that the interpreters of the Greek Old Testament knew the Hebrew lexicon was talking about the sixth day of the week. If it was day seven of the first new month, that means it would have been day six of the first week, and that would disparage any discrepancy.

Definitely a point to ponder, in the Old Testament if a person ended his work on the seventh day, he could have been stoned. Numbers 15:32-36; You can read where they stoned a man who was picking up sticks on the seventh day (Sabbath)

And while the children of Israel were in the wilderness, they found a man that gathered sticks upon the sabbath day. And they that found him gathering sticks brought him unto Moses and Aaron, and unto all the congregation. And they put him in ward, because it was not declared what should be done to him. And the Lord said unto Moses, The man shall be surely put to death: all the congregation shall stone him with stones without the camp. And all the congregation brought him without the camp, and stoned him with stones, and he died; as the Lord commanded Moses. Num.15:32-36

If G-d finished His work on the seventh day of the week, we would have a real injustice here, but we know that G-d is equitable, fair, and just. Therefore, we realize that G-d could not have finished His work on the seventh day of the week. But He could have on the seventh day of the month. A week would not have been declared until it was over, and the week was not over until Elohim proclaimed it to be, when He rested. Thereby, affirming the first week and putting into play His heavenly time piece.

Now, let us read the Septuagint/Greek version of the same incident, the Septuagint makes it very evident that God finished His work on the sixth day of the week, because the Septuagint was just dealing with the days of a week at that point in time. The Hebrew version was equating/reconciling the seventh day of a month with the sixth day of the week. Both versions continue with the narrative G-d rested on the seventh day, from all His work, making it very obvious that it was the seventh day of the very first week. However, by Hebrew reckoning, it would have been the eighth day of the month. At that point, they are declaring the end of the week, consequently, the seventh day.

Furthermore, looking back to Genesis 2:4, the word day is translated from the word ‘Yom’. However, we already know that Elohim did not create everything in one day. Therefore, ‘yom’ takes on it’s second meaning, which is a period of time. It should be noted here, that the Hebrews did have a word to designate a week, and that word is ‘Sabua’ (pronounced Shaw-boo-ah) in the strong concordance #H7620 meaning a period of 7 days. Throughout the Bible, ‘yom’ is never used to express a week. The fact that ‘yom’ is used in Genesis 2:4 to express a weekly period of time, when a more specific word could have been used, leaves room for a more nuanced interpretation.

The first New Moon day, however not very obvious, but definitely insinuated, was proclaimed by G-d. This is made clear by the way light was created and named. That would have been the very first day created, a new beginning of a month, however, not the first day of the first week. The first day of the week would have been the second day of the month. That is the only way that the Hebrew “haya” can mean both “were” and “followed” and bring truth and clarity to the first two chapters of the Bible. This eight day count from the first new moon day of the month to get to the seventh day of the week is insinuated in the book of Joshua ch.6.

Yhvh would have never suggested that Israel be in complete war paraphernalia for seven days knowing that one of those days would have been the Sabbath. However, it does make sense, if the first day was a new moon day. This is corroborated in the Book of Jasher

And it was in the second month, on the first day of the month, that the Lord said to Joshua, Rise up, behold I have given Jericho into thy hand with all the people thereof; and all your fighting men shall go round the city, once each day, thus shall you do for six days. Jasher 88:14

You might wonder why I feel confident to referance the book of Jasher, while studying the Bible. The Bible itself, in the Book of Joshua ch.10:13 references Jasher, and also in 2 Samuel 1:18. So, it is helpful to better understand the historical context. Therefore the day after that siege they would have been able to keep the sacred Sabbath. There are other hidden pearls/stories throughout the Bible that give affirmation to this thesis.

And G-d said, Let there be lights in the firmament of the heaven to divide the day from the night; and let them be for signs, and for seasons, and for days, and years: Gen.1:14

The word “seasons” according to Strongs Concordance is #H4150, (moed) meaning; appointed time, sacred seasons, set feast. As in New Moon days and His Sabbaths. The word Day (yom) meaning the light of the day. At that point in creation the only (mo-ed)/feast days would have been New Moon day and the day Elohim rested from His work, (Sabbath). The other Feast days/weeks come into play much later because of mans sin.

An important manifestation of Elohim’s time piece is new moon day. You start your month by the first sliver of the moon (new moon day), then start your day count for your week; six work days then Sabbath. One is able to tell what day of the week it is, (first day, second day, third day…sixth day, then seventh day, Sabbath), by the size and shape and the light of the moon. It is evident in each month (Elohim’s month) one can proclaim what day of the week it is by the light of the moon. All Elohim’s Sabbaths fall on a particular cycle of the moon. For instance, the waxing half moon (first sabbath), the full moon (second sabbath), the waining half moon (third sabbath) and then dark moon (Elohim’s fourth sabbath of the month), then a new month will start, with a new moon day, and the week will follow repeating itself four times using the cycles of the moon for its Sabbaths. Six work days then the seventh day Sabbath, a day of rest and worship. Yhvh’s time piece was introduced at creation, declared in the heavens, left for us to discover, while looking for truth within His handiwork.

For as the new heavens and the new earth, which I will make, shall remain before me, saith the Lord, so shall your seed and your name remain. And it shall come to pass, that from one new moon to another, and from one sabbath to another, shall all flesh come to worship before me, saith the Lord. Isa 66:22-23

The heavens declare the glory of G-d; and the firmament sheweth his handywork. Day unto day uttereth speech, and night unto night sheweth knowledge. There is no speech nor language, where their voice is not heard. Their line is gone out through all the earth, and their words to the end of the world. In them hath he set a tabernacle for the sun, Which is as a bridegroom coming out of his chamber, and rejoiceth as a strong man to run a race. His going forth is from the end of the heaven, and his circuit unto the ends of it: and there is nothing hid from the heat thereof. The law of the Lord is perfect, converting the soul: the testimony of the Lord is sure, making wise the simple. The statutes of the Lord are right, rejoicing the heart: the commandment of the Lord is pure, enlightening the eyes. The fear of the Lord is clean, enduring for ever: the judgments of the Lord are true and righteous altogether... Let the words of my mouth, and the meditation of my heart, be acceptable in thy sight, O Lord, my strength, and my redeemer. Ps.19:1-9 .14

He appointed the moon for seasons: the sun knoweth his going down. Ps.104:19

+

As you can see from the verses above Yhvh appointed the moon to keep His seasons (moed). V.2 of Ps.19 goes on to claim that the night reveals knowledge. You can not discern what day of the week it is by the sun, but you can ascertain what day of the week it is by the nighttime moon. And in V.3 there is no language where the voice is not heard. That means that Yhvh made it known to everyone, there is no private interpretation, nature (the moon) reveals knowledge through a language that everyone can experience and understand. Yhvh’s time piece was always set in the skies for us to discover/rediscover. The moon was appointed so one could tell which week of the month they were in, and which day of the week it was.

However Yhvh hid His sabbaths from his people; vgl. Lamentations 2:5,6

Since the appointed feasts, such as new moon days, and Sabbaths which were regulated by the moon cycle, have been forgotten. It is up to Yhvh’s people to rediscover, through searching prayerfully the word of G-d for TRUTH.

Today’s calendars no longer rely on monthly cycles, they are not regulated by the beauty of G-d’s creation, His handiwork, or the lights in the heavens. Yhvh has created His time piece in the heavens for us to discover, contemplate, investigate and enjoy. May eyes be opened and TRUTH be found by all those who search.

[Ria Tameg]

Shabua (a week) is used approximately 22 to 24 times in scripture. Never once, in the context of these verses, is it used for a 7 day period. It's only ever used to describe a 7 week period. Always refering to harvest festivals spread 7 weeks apart. I found this interesting. Nowhere does s ripture refer to 7 DAY periods as "weeks". This should matter to some.

Shabua means "a sevening", which literally means "seven sevens".

G-ds sabbath is the 7th day of a lunar count, directly after new moon day. But these 7 day increments are never called "weeks" (shabua) anywhere in scripture.

What we today call a week, is just a 7 day period. However, the hebrew definition of a week, called a shabua, is a sevening. Or seven sevens, by definition. So a shabua does NOT refer to 1 seven day period, but seven of them. Which is the exact tracing system of G-ds harvest seasons, 4 of them, throughout the year. First fruits (barly), feast of weeks (wheat), etc, all being 7 shabuas apart.



The prophet Isaiah testified that "G-d did NOT create from a position of darkness".
Day, as G-d defined, is the period of the suns light.

Genesis 1:1, according to Isaiah, was a period of light. Scripture doesnt say the darkness began until Genesis 1:2. Then in Genesis 1:3, G-d commanded the light (day) to return.

[Ria Tameg]

The weekly continuous cycle that is non-scriptural from world-religions ignores the signs from our father of lights.

The Luni-Solar Date Line is the line of demarcation established on earth by the sun and moon at the luni-solar conjunction. This phenomenon takes place at the beginning of each lunar cycle and is very predictable. Unlike the man-made Date Line, the Luni-Solar Date line is not arbitrary; rather, it is based upon the motions of the heavenly bodies, just as Yhvh intended

And G-d said, Let there be lights in the firmament of the heaven to divide the day from the night; and let them be for signs, and for seasons, and for days, and years: Gen.1:14

The Luni-Solar Date Line was established at Creation with the ordination of the sun and moon. It was established by Yhvh. It is determined at the beginning of each lunation by the motions of the heavenly bodies (in accordance with Genesis 1:14).

What makes the Luni-Solar Date Line so remarkable is that it allows us to differentiate between calendar days without man's inventions (i.e. the International Date Line). Consequently, there is no need whatsoever for man's counterfeit date line.

Had the Father's feast days never been forgotten and His calendar never forsaken, there would have been no reason to conjure up the man-made IDL.

Can the Luni-Solar Date Line be moved by man?

No. Because the Luni-Solar Date Line is determined by the heavenly bodies, it is out of man's reach. The Luni-Solar Date Line is under the direct supervision of Father Yhvh, who by wisdom founded the earth and by understanding established the heavens

The Lord by wisdom hath founded the earth; by understanding hath he established the heavens. Proverbs 3:19

The Roman Papal Gregorian Calendar with its unbroken cycle of weeks is inexorably dependent upon the International Date Line. This is a huge problem for those who profess to adhere to Scripture alone.

Think about this for a moment:

When Noah's family began to grow and replenish the earth after the flood, some would have travelled east and some would have travelled west. Eventually the two groups would have met each other on the other side of the world. Now consider this: If Noah's descendants were observing a continuous weekly cycle, they would have been one calendar day apart when they met on the other side (e.g. one group would be observing the sixth day, while the other group was observing the seventh day). The reason for this is that those who travelled east were travelling towards the rising sun (beginning their days earlier with each eastward movement), while those who travelled west were travelling towards the setting sun (beginning their days later with each westward movement). Consequently, when the two groups met on the other side of the world, those who had been travelling east would be one day ahead of those who were travelling west.

So, who would be right?

Who's calendar would have been correct?

If they had been observing a continuous weekly cycle, they would both be correct, which is not possible. This again demonstrates the fallacy of a continuous weekly cycle.

If these ancient men and women of Yhvh were not using the modern counterfeit date line to measure time, what were they using?

And G-d said, Let there be lights in the firmament of the heaven to divide the day from the night; and let them be for signs, and for seasons, and for days, and years: Gen.1:14

They were using the Luni-Solar Date Line, which is established each lunation by the

"lights in the firmament of the heaven."

If erring men had not abandoned Heaven's calendar and neglected Yhvh's feast days, the counterfeit date line would never have been necessary. The man-made IDL is the result of open rebellion against Heaven.

How can you consistently observe a Saturday Sabbath without using the man-made International Date Line?

You can't, otherwise you either gain or lose a day depending on which way you are traveling.

It is irrefutably impossible to use the Roman Papal Gregorian Calendar without also using the man-made date line - for it is this very line that tells you when to transition from one day to the next; it is this very line that tells you which days to reckon as holy, and which days to reckon as common. This perhaps makes no difference to the institutionalized Sunday-keeping churches that teach lawlessness, but to those who are zealous for the things of Yhvh and who recognize the eternal value of His Sabbaths and feast days, this makes all this difference in the world!

If we are to serve the Father without compromise, we must allow His word alone to distinguish for us that which is holy from that which is common. That is to say we must use Heaven's calendar and Heaven's date line to determine when the Sabbaths and feast days arrive, not man's counterfeit date line that's been zigzagging its way throughout the Pacific ocean for the last 130 years. "Holy" always refers to something that G-d has set apart, or that G-d has put His own presence into. The classification of holy and unholy was made by Him BEFORE any human beings ever sinned.


The world simply cannot be united in observing a Gregorian day/date without using the International Date Line. The question that logically follows then is,

"How can Saturday be Heaven's ordained seventh-day Sabbath?"

There is simply no way around it; if the day matters, then the method used to calculate the day matters, too. You cannot have it both ways, i.e. you cannot say that the seventh-day Sabbath is of the upmost importance to our Father in Heaven, while also saying it is acceptable to let worldly men determine when the seventh-day Sabbath begins and ends (via the International Date Line).

[Ria Tameg]

in Hebrew, one (echad) is always attached to first (rosh), but must proceed first (come after) it never precedes first (comes during or before).

Genesis 2:10 "Now a river went out of Eden to water the garden, and FROM there (proceeding there) it parted and became 4 riverheads. The name of the one is pishon. . .second gishon. . . .third hiddekel. . . .fourth Euphrates.

Note: there are 5 rivers mentioned.

"A river" (presumably first) One river Two river Three river Four river

The point is, "one river" (pishon) was NOT the beginning or first river.

The scripture clearly states that a river came before it in ordering. Yet pishon is still labeled as "one river".

This proves that one does NOT begin any hebrew count.

One is ATTACHED to the beginning, but SEPERATED in ordering/count.

The menorah works the same way. There are 7 visible branches of the menorah that have lamps for light. But scripture AND hebrew tradition, actually call the stem of the menorah a branch also. The stem of the menorah is also refered to as the root/base of the menorah in scripture.

Yeshua said that HE is the root of Jesse.

A root is UNSEEN, and the plant/branches grow up from the root and become visible.

In the new testament it states Yesgua is the seed. A seed, like the root, is unseen. And the branches grow up into visibility from it.

New moon day is UNSEEN and the branches (days of the week) grow off from it Similar to the 5 rivers mentioned in Genesis 2.

The 4 rivers listed were NOT the first river, nor the beginning of the water flow.

Genesis 2:10 states that these 4 rivers were preceeded by another uncounted river, that we know must have came first in ordering. This is the entire concept of new moon day. The unseen moon (conjunction) is the FIRST day of the month, in ordering.

And day one, two, three.. . .branch off from this day in the order of counting.

The book of Enoch states twice that the son of G-d was "hidden" from the beginning, which was Genesis 1:1.

That word "hidden" is the hebrew word kese. The same word used in Psalm 81:3, when it says in the hebrew text that the new moon day is the "kese kasa" new moon.

Kese = full or fully Kasa = covered, conceiled, HIDDEN Just like the 5 rivers mentioned in Genesis 2. The first one listed isnt even numbered. Its count is hidden.

Then it goes on to list the other 4 that branch off of it as "one,two, three, four". Clearly "one" was not the first or beginning.

The "first" is always hidden and needs searched out by us

"It is the glory of G-d to HIDE a matter, and the honor of kings to search it out" (paraphrase).





Remember, of the 5 rivers, the first one came out of Eden. Eden was the HOLY garden of G-d. Nothing unholy could enter it. This means that this first river was HOLY. Seperated from the rest. The Hebrew word holy means "to seperate, divide". G-d clearly wanted to show that this river began INSIDE the holy garden, which made it SEPERATE from the others that branched off of it. And the branching off of the 4 other rivers took place OUTSIDE the garden. Which God said outside of the garden was NOT holy. Or not seperated.

Like the river that originated in the garden of holiness, so too is the new moon day a "holy" day. Which means its count needs to be seperated from the non holy days in order and count.

Am I just making this up?

No.

Ezekiel 46 reveals the same thing.

It states that we must SEPERATE the new moon day from the 6 work days.

Just as we know to seperate the 6 work days (unholy days) from the holy 7th day sabbath.

Leviticus 10:10 (paraphrase)
"My people fail because they do NOT seperate the holy from the unholy".

New moon day is a holy day. 6 work days are unholy. 7th day sabbath is holy. Once we learn to SEPERATE these days in counting, then we will be in obedience to G-ds command.

[Ria Tameg]

'Yom echad', “day one”, (Gen 1:5) should not be read as though it were the “first day”, as the use of 'yom echad' elsewhere in Genesis demonstrate (Genesis 27:45, Genesis 33:13, 1 Samuel 27:1, Isiah 9:13, Jonah 3:4).

Rabbi Umberto Cassuto’s explanation is worthy of note:

“There was only 'day one' for the second had not yet been created? Why would the writer of Genesis have avoided the use of “yom rishon (first day)” in this chapter of Genesis?”

Cassuto says there are two possible solutions…

1st:
The grammatical construction of Genesis 1 allows potentially for the two “first days” at the beginning of the chapter. The day that begins in verse 3 “and there was light” – and the day that may appear to begin in verse 1 “bereshit”, in the beginning. In this conception of the narrative of chapter 1, the author of Genesis may have wanted to avoid the idea that the day that begins in verse 3 was actually “yom rishon (the first day)”.

He may have wanted to reserve the notion of “the first day” for the day that begins with “bereshit”, in the beginning, in verse 1. Thus 'yom echad' was used to avoid the misconception. In the same way the author does not say “nahar ha rishon (the first river)” in Genesis 2:11, but rather “ha echad (one river)”, because the first river is that divides into four heads.

2nd:
A second possible reason for avoiding the mention of a “first day” is that throughout the Torah the expression “yom rishon” is used to denote the ‘first day” of a special feast, a day in which there is to be no work (example: Exodus 12:16, Leviticus 23:7, 35, 39, Numbers 28:18). The use of “yom echad” may have been intended to avoid a possible objection to the work of YHWY on one such “yom rishon” in chapter 1. So this “yom rishon (the first day)” that preceded “yom echad (day one)”, had to be a special feast of no work in the hebrew languages explanation often overlooked in the English translations.

We can determine that yom rishon, a special feast, is new moon day in the beginning of the creation account, and yom echad (day one) is day one of the work week.

The day of the new moon is always outside of the work week.

Ezekiel 46 and Amos 8 tell us that new moon day CANNOT be on any of the 6 work days. It also tells us new moon day CANNOT be on the 7th day sabbath.

This means that new moon day is a 3rd category of day, outside of the week, for G-d commanded new moon day to be the very beginning of every month, then after new moon day the 6 days of work can start followed by a 7th day sabbath. This pattern continues until the new new moon day at conjunction, where the week becomes reset with the new month.

[Ria Tameg]

here is my study from today. Based on the original paleo hebrew pictograph, the original hebrew.

Word study: Light (oar in hebrew). First used in Genesis 1:3

Paleo hebrew pictograph spelling:
(Read Right to left)
Resh, vav, aleph

Aleph is a picture of an ox head and means "ox, work, one".

Vav is a picture of a nail and means "bind, attached to"

Resh is a picture of a mans head and means "first, top, chief, summit" (all words scripture uses to describe new moon day!)

The Hebrew root word of LIGHT (oar) is "ar". "ar" is spelled "aleph, resh"

"ar", the root word of light, forms it's own word and is defined as "to order, gather, organize, to be led from the FIRST".

Aleph represents "one" in Hebrew
Resh means "first" in Hebrew

The word "ar", meaning to order, uses the hebrew pictograph letters meaning "one and first".

The word LIGHT (aleph, vav, resh) literally paints the picture that "the one is bound to the first".
Think in terms of the month. Day one is attached to the first day, which is new moon day.

New moon day is the dark/conjunction new moon per Psalm 81:3. The moon has no light. When the word LIGHT first appears in Genesis 1:3, it is showing that the sun has now began giving its LIGHT to the moon.
The book of Enoch says that this first happens when the sun begins to rise, but that the moons light cannot be seen during the day. It is not until the sun sets, that the moon receives its authority, and light for signs.
Enoch wrote "the sun gives its light to the moon, IN PERIODS OF SEVEN DAYS".

The hebrew word for week is SHABUA. Shabua is defined by the hebrew concordance as "A PERIOD OF SEVEN DAYS". Exactly what Enoch said the moon determines, according to the light it receives from the sun.

And this hebrew word for LIGHT (aleph vav resh) reveals that the "one" (day one, Genesis 1:3) is ATTACHED TO the "first" (first day, new moon day), in ordering. Since its root word "ar" means ordering.
A hebrew root word, which exists inside of all hebrew words, helps define the original word being used. It gives it further context and definition.

So we can literally say, the "aleph Vav resh", or the "one attached to the first", is the ORDERING of Light.
Genesis 1:5 says LIGHT is for DAYS. Or for the counting of days of the week.

The hebrew word LIGHT reveals that day one must be attached to, and come after the first day (new moon day) to have the correct ordering for our months and weeks.

[Ria Tameg]

Your study is very inspiring, convincing and helpful. Great Job! So if you have all these inspirations Hats off! In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

So First and one are connected by the letter Vav which implies connection. This just reminds me to the Star of David/Name of David (Dalet-Vav-Dalet) where the Vav connects the first and last letter of Davids name together. The six-pointed Star of David consists of two reversed superimposed Paleo-Hebrew dalets.

The word אור ("light") has a gematria value of 207. The 207th word in the Bible is להאיר ("to give light") when G-d set (the two great lights) in the firmament of the heaven, to give light to the earth (Gen 1:17) for measuring time by the elements day and years, which teaches us that we do not have to look outside the heavenly bodies to determine our calendar or our holy days or times. They work together like husband and wife, a wonderful unit of marriage, to determine the time.

So why should we refer to YHWH's calendar for His appointments, except for His most important appointment, Shabbat?

Furthermore I think, the Light, commanded in V.3 points to the Torah as well in a spiritual sense.

And G-d saw that the light was good; Gen 1:4a.
וַיַּ֧רְא אֱלֹהִ֛ים אֶת-הָאֹ֖ור כִּי-טֹ֑וב

We recognize the Alef-Tav the light as the Torah because its gematria is 613. The Torah has 613 commandments.

אֶת-הָאֹ֖ור
1. א Alef 1
22. ת תּ Tav/Sav 400
5. ה He 5
1. א Alef 1
6. ו Vav 6
20. ר Resch 200
Σ 613

The light of which the eternal G-d speaks then is probably also the Torah

Your word is a lamp to my foot and a light to my path. Ps.119:105

The Torah is often referred to as chayyim torah, i.e. living Torah. the light of Torah and (commandments

G-d's people will become the guiding light for the nations in the Messianic Aeon, for the Gentile nations will come to your light, Isa.60,3

After G-d unveils and reveals the light, the Torah, it becomes manifest in the midst of the darkness (of the nations)

For behold, darkness covers the earth and deep darkness the nations; but upon you the LORD rises, and His glory appears over you. Isa.60,2

[Ria Tameg]

nice write up. I like gleaning from you. Although I encourage you to research the star of David. It was a hard reality check for me to accept. It has no history in scripture. It is directly tied to saturn worship. The ancients even called this star the star of Chiun (saturn in hebrew) in the book of Exodus. And in the book of Acts, Stephen called it the star of Remphan (saturn in greek). Please research that, there are many videos on you tube showing the history of this.

Gods only symbol to Israel was the menorah. And menorah in hebrew actually means "moons measured/numbered light". I have a great etymological breakdown of this if you ever want to see it. Because the menorah also tracks the calendar.
Here is a great study on the word armagheddon:
If I wanted to teach you the Hebrew word for God, I wouldn’t spell it as, “אֱלֹהִים”—rather, I would spell it as, “Elohim.” This is how transliteration works: I take the closest English letters I can find to help you pronounce the Hebrew word, recognizing that Hebrew letters are likely foreign to you.

John uses this same tactic in Revelation 16:16 when he tells his greek readers that the final showdown between God’s army and Satan’s army will happen “at the place that in Hebrew is called Ἁρμαγεδών”—which is what we typically call, “Armageddon” in English. But “Armageddon” actually isn’t the right pronunciation of John’s transliterated Greek word. See that little apostrophe looking thing at the beginning? That’s what is known as a hard breathing mark, which means John expected his readers to pronounce his word with a hard breath at the beginning—that is, “hhhhhh-armageddon.” (There’s no H in the Greek alphabet, so John is doing his best here to help the Greeks pronounce his Hebrew word correctly.)

That being said, the correct pronunciation is, “Har Magedon.” Now in Hebrew, “Har” means mountain, so John’s readers would be left thinking of “Mount Magedon.” But the problem is that there is no “Mount Magedon” in the Scriptures. So then what is John talking about? Well, we need to do some more transliterating to find out.

Since Hebrew has no vowels, “Har Magedon” would be spelled, “H-R-M-G-D.” We already suspect “H-R” stands for mount, but what about “M-G-D?” Well, as it ends up, M-G-D doesn’t really line up with anything that makes sense in Hebrew. However, if we substitute the “G” for the Hebrew character “ayin” (‘) which also makes a G sound, our Hebrew word would now be pronounced, “Har Mo’ed.” And believe it or not, that mountain actually does exist in the Bible. It’s found in Isaiah 14:13 and in English we call it, “the Mount of Assembly.”

This is the special mountain that God reigned from and met with his heavenly assembly—a mountain also referred to as “Mount Zion” or “Jerusalem.” But John doesn’t want us to think blankly of Jerusalem, but specifically of the time it was called Har Mo’ed in the Scriptures. Why? Because Har Mo’ed is the story of why Satan was kicked out of Heaven. Isaiah 14 informs us that Satan tried to usurp God from his mountain in order to gain control over the heavenly assembly. John wants us to remember that story, because at the end of Revelation, he’s picturing Satan as trying to do it all over again.

John’s not crafting Revelation entirely out of pure vision and mystery. He’s steeped in the Scriptures and using Bible references and stories through the direction of the Spirit to show us where things are headed. He wants us to know that Satan still wants God’s throne and control of the assembly and that he’s just arrogant and stupid enough to have the audacity to try to take it again. It’s his ultimate endgame.

[Ria Tameg]

Thanks for the insights into the word study Armageddon. I think the issue of worship, G‑d and Satan fighting, calendars and appointed times has to do with the mark of the beast.

A double pattern can almost always be found in the Bible. As for the Star of David the majority of Jews see the star as a symbol of their unique relationship with G-d, of past and present persecution and how G-d delivered and protected them, of hope and faith in G-d, of the unity of the Jewish people. They give glory to G-d! Nevertheless, there are those who would associate ANY star symbol with the occult. Instead, I find it more profitably, to think about examples that show the connection between the Star of David and the Creator or Creation, not least because of other profound associations.

First all things were created as good by Yhvh in the first place, and all the symbolic associations within the material Universe were likely originally associated with the goodness of their Creator as well. The point that matters should not how others have misused or misinterpreted symbols in the past or present, but what meaning YOU I WE attach to them, or not? As with many other things, it depends on how the symbols are used. But that does not affect the original in the least. In kindergarten when one child has an idea, he/she claims ownership over it. When dealing with sacred things, we don’t care if other cultures have it too.

The Star of David is the template that decodes much of Scripture. It is also the only key that unifies the entire Alefbet. All the letters (including the Sofit letters) can be found in it. I am not aware of any figure from which all the letters of another language can be traced in its form lines. So the Hebrew belongs to the Star of David. The Hebrew Alefbet is based on it.

https://up.picr.de/42535989ia.jpg


The Star of David is the only symbol or geometric shape that perfectly corresponds to the very first verse in the Torah. Countless times the mathematics and geometry of the Bible reveals the Star of David as the divine seal. I would even go so far as to say that biblical mathematics is unthinkable without the Star of David

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1nMm ... sp=sharing
https://docs.google.com/document/d/16E2 ... sp=sharing
( just a small selection from biblical mathematics of different authors. The topic is almost inexhaustible)

Howsoever I have a question of understanding:

What exactly do you mean by the Ram Ram constelation or is the double mention a typing error?

Concerning the conjunction as a new moon day, I will read Arnold Bowen again. As far as I remember, he takes the same or similar view as you

[Ria Tameg]

I've just read the following in Eddie Chumney's book The Seven Feasts of the Messiah where it says on pages 47 & 48:

----------beginnn of quote ---------------------
3. The Feast of Unleavened Bread (Chag HaMazzot) is a High Shabbat. In Hebrew, a High Shabbat is called a Shabbaton. During Passover (Pesach) there is an extra Shabbat alongside the weekly Shabbat.
...
These Shabbats are called High Shabbats. We find this High Shabbat in John 19:31.
-----------end of quote ---------------------------



A few thoughts on this that confirm the lunar Sabbath.

There are three annual biblical dates (moedim) that are not considered Shabbaton. Two of these occur in spring. The 1st and 7th days of Chag HaMatzot (Feast of Unleavened Bread) are NOT called Shabbaton. It is noteworthy that these days are allowed for the preparation of food - presumably for this reason they are never referred to as "complete rest days".

The word Shabbaton occurs in the description of day 7/week, the four holy days of month 7, and the Sabbath of the land (sabbatical year).

The BDB Hebrew Lexicon also lists these days:

A. The weekly Sabbath
B. the Feast of Trumpets
C. Day of Atonement
D. The first and last day of the Feast of Tabernacles
E. Sabbath year

This shows that Day 7/Week and the Feast of Unleavened Bread fall on the same day, for when the High Sabbath is called a shabbaton it is because Day/7 is a shabbaton (A), but not the feast day. All other options (B-E) are ruled out.

The Jews therefore, because it was the preparation, that the bodies should not remain upon the cross on the sabbath day [σαββάτῳ] , (for that sabbath day [σαββάτου] was an high day, [μεγάλη ἡ ἡμέρα]) besought Pilate that their legs might be broken, and that they might be taken away. John 19:31 KJV

The weekly sabbath always coincides with the first day of unleavened bread, which is then called the great day.

John 19:31 confirms that the high feast day (of the unleavened bread), the fifteenth day/month, falls annually on the seventh-day Sabbath.

While the Torah refers to the seventh day/week as a shabbat shabbathown, the first day of unleavened bread is never so referred to.

The statement that there were not two Sabbaths in the week of the crucifixion, the great Sabbath and days later the weekly Sabbath, but the weekly Sabbath coincides with the Feastday on the 15th and then the next was again on the 22nd, is confirmed by the Septuagint.


The word "feast", hebrew chag, can be derived from its root word and translates as "to move in a circle," meaning that the Creator gave His feasts as a cycle to be observed yearly

Thou shalt therefore keep this ordinance in his season from year to year. Ex.13:10

In the biblical calendar, the day 7/week falls constantly on the 15th day of the month and therefore this order can be kept in its time year after year. In a calendar with uninterrupted weeks, this is impossible.